• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • blog
  • About
  • Book Publications
  • Other Reading
  • Social Wall
  • Back Pages
  • Contact Me
< Back

The Story the Media Should Have Told You About Glasgow

May 7, 2012

The Story the Media Should Have Told You About Glasgow

Gerry Hassan

May 7th 2012

The story of the recent Scottish elections was clear and unambiguous: voters are returning home to Labour and the SNP honeymoon is over. All of this is magnified in the Glasgow result: Labour holding or as most of the media interpreted it ‘gaining’ back the city it had briefly lost.

All of this ‘analysis’ was done with no breakdown of the Scottish local election party share of the vote; no doubt we will have to wait until David Denver’s research several months down the line for this.

Despite the preponderance of Glasgow in political and media spin there has also been no detailed breakdown of vote changes in Scotland’s biggest city. This short piece provides that analysis and is done not to claim that the city speaks for Scotland but merely to offer the actual figures for debate and wider understanding.

First lets take party share of vote (Table One). Labour won 47.91% of the vote to the SNP’s 31.76%. This represents an increase in the Labour vote of 4.6% and for the Nationalists of 7.18%: amounting to a swing of 1.29% from Labour to the SNP.

Table One: Glasgow Party Share of Vote (Percentage) 2007-12
Party                            2007               2012                  Change
Labour                        43.31              47.91                 + 4.60
SNP                            24.58              31.76                 + 7.18
Conservative               7.67                6.07                  – 1.60
Green                          6.48                5.67                  – 0.81
Lib Dem                      7.91                2.99                  – 4.92
Others                        10.04               5.60                  – 4.44

 

Second if we look at the real change in actual votes of people rather than percentages a more complex picture emerges. All the parties lost votes in Glasgow on Thursday but some lost more votes than others (see Table Two).

Labour’s vote across the city fell from 81,393 to 67,612, a decline of 13,781; the SNP’s vote from 46,185 to 44,827, a fall of 1,358; these represent falls of percentage wise 16.93% for Labour from 2007 and 2.94% for the SNP.

Table Two: Glasgow Party Share of Vote (Actual Numbers) 2007-12
Party                           2007                           2012               Change
Labour                        81,393                        67,612            – 13,781
SNP                            46,185                        44,827            – 1,358
Conservative              14,412                        8,567              – 5,845
Green                          12,183                       7,999              – 4,184
Lib Dem                      14,864                        4,221              – 10,643
Others                        18,879                        7,902              – 10,977
Total                           187,916                     141,128           – 46,788

 

The Lib Dem vote fell by 10,643 representing a collapse of 71.60% from five years ago. However, if you think the voter rejection of the Lib Dems is marked, spare a thought for the Scottish Socialist Party and Solidarity who once combined as a powerful electoral force. The former lost 83.5% of their previous vote, but this was easily surpassed by the latter, Solidarity who lost an impressive 93.0% of their 2007 vote.

Then there were the forces of ‘Glasgow First’, mostly made of former Labour councillors, who won a mere 2,544 votes with 20 candidates giving them a miniscule 1.80% of the vote.

Therefore the Glasgow local elections, like Scotland overall, paint a rich, complicated picture last Thursday, but one the media didn’t spend time exploring. Instead, it went with the by-lines and clichés of their own simplifications, spinning about the ‘spin’ of party politicians as much of what passes for contemporary media analysis does.

Labour won Glasgow and polled relatively well versus expectations and its opponents. The Nationalists walked into a trap mostly of their own making. Yet it is also true that the pattern of Labour’s success in Glasgow does not provide a basis for Labour’s fightback. Labour’s success was based on getting a significant part of its existing vote out in a declining turnout: a ‘base’ strategy which paid the party a decent dividend last week but doesn’t offer much for the future.

What Labour did do was two things; one it managed the war of expectations and outmanoeuvred an over-reaching SNP; second, it has as Johann Lamont recognised post-election engaged in a successful defensive blockade which has bought it time. Labour has been ‘running on empty’ in terms of resources and ideas post-2011 election and it has despite this managed to blunt the SNP advance.

The lessons for the SNP are complex. They have a Glasgow/West of Scotland problem which is deep seated, 2011 apart. The threshold they have they have to cross has been lowered by the weakening of the Labour voting bloc across a range of socio-economic characteristics. Yet at the same time winning in Glasgow has been made more difficult by the decline of the Tories. To put this in perspective when Labour previously lost control of Glasgow council in 1968 and 1977, the Nationalist vote percentage wise was much as it is now; then the city had a multi-party politics with a strong Tory presence. Today with two big parties such levels of support leaves the Nationalists significantly behind Labour.

Finally, an observation about the mainstream media’s role. We need more than following headlines and spin; that doesn’t amount to much of a contribution to the democratic debate. The Glasgow story is a fascinating one; it holds lessons and challenges for all Scotland’s parties. It was a story the media choose not to tell.

 

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: Glasgow, Scottish Labour Party, Scottish Media, Scottish Nationalists, Scottish politics

Primary Sidebar

categories

  • Blog
  • Events
  • Futures Thinking
  • International Conversations
  • Longer Essays
  • Short Essays
  • What Gerry's groovin' to
  • What Gerry's reading
FacebookTwitter

featured publication

Scotland Rising: The Case for Independence

Click here to buy Gerry’s latest book.

what Gerry’s groovin’ to

My Music Albums of the Year

January 2, 2025

what Gerry’s reading

Books of the Year: Politics, History, Culture and Ideas

December 26, 2024

tags

Scottish politics | Scottish Independence | Scottish Review | British politics | The Scotsman | Scottish Nationalists | Scottish Nationalism | Open Democracy | Nicola Sturgeon | Scottish Labour Party | Sunday National | Scottish society | The British State | Sunday Mail | Brexit | Scottish National Party | Boris Johnson | Social Democracy | British Labour Party | Conservative Party | Alex Salmond | Bella Caledonia | Jeremy Corbyn | Popular Culture | David Cameron | Scottish Parliament | The National | Scottish Media | Scottish Independence Referendum | British Conservatives | Labour Party | British Nationalism | Social Justice | Scottish Men | Scottish Unionism | British Society | The Future of the Left | 2021 Scottish Parliament elections | Football | Scottish Culture

Categories

Footer

about Gerry

Gerry Hassan is a writer, commentator and thinker about Scotland, the UK, politics and ideas.

More >

recent

  • Why the Reform Bandwagon is coming to Scotland – and what can be done to stop it?
  • The Road from 2014 is Over: A New Road Map is needed for Scotland and Independence
  • Why does the story of the Beatles and Lennon and McCartney still matter?

search

FacebookTwitter

Terms of Use | Privacy Statement
Copyright © Gerry Hassan - writing, research, policy and ideas. All Rights Reserved.
Illustration and website design by Infinite Eye